<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post116064326079618054..comments</id><updated>2008-02-07T14:58:43.463-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on BiblePlaces Blog: Is This Noah's Ark?: A New Critique by Gordon Fran...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/feeds/116064326079618054/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/116064326079618054/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/2006/10/is-this-noahs-ark-new-critique-by.html'/><author><name>Todd Bolen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06156730661243501832</uri><email>tbolen91@bibleplaces.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-2653561149289921788</id><published>2008-02-07T14:58:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2008-02-07T14:58:00.000-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Genesis never says that Noah took plants, bacteria...</title><content type='html'>Genesis never says that Noah took plants, bacteria, and insects onto the boat. Those types of species could survive a flood (plus fish and other sea creatures, which you are including in your broad numbers). Additionally, 2 of each subspecies would not be necessary, as all of the variants today have developed over time through adaptation into subspecies of a common ancestor (different types of dogs for example). Finally, if one looks at the dimensions of the boat/ark and makes calculations, it is apparent that it would be able to hold over 50,000 sheep sized animals, while still providing ample living space. It was a really huge boat, but the laboratory was unnecessary.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/116064326079618054/comments/default/2653561149289921788'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/116064326079618054/comments/default/2653561149289921788'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/2006/10/is-this-noahs-ark-new-critique-by.html?showComment=1202417880000#c2653561149289921788' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/2006/10/is-this-noahs-ark-new-critique-by.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-116064326079618054' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/posts/default/116064326079618054' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-5398094537998562304</id><published>2007-06-27T16:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-06-27T16:58:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>For the sake of the debate, lets say that they fou...</title><content type='html'>For the sake of the debate, lets say that they found a REALLY, REALLY big boat. It is imbossible to take all species two by two. Lets look at some numbers of KNOWN species.&lt;BR/&gt;287,655 plants&lt;BR/&gt;1.5 million fungi&lt;BR/&gt;10,000 lichens&lt;BR/&gt;1,190,200 invertebrates&lt;BR/&gt;58,808 vertebrates&lt;BR/&gt;5-10 million bacteria&lt;BR/&gt;1.5 million &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Grand total = 8,046,663 (low estimate)&lt;BR/&gt;Two by two = 16,093,326&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Must have been a really huge boat equipped with a modern lab to house the bacteria and fungi....</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/116064326079618054/comments/default/5398094537998562304'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/116064326079618054/comments/default/5398094537998562304'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/2006/10/is-this-noahs-ark-new-critique-by.html?showComment=1182981480000#c5398094537998562304' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.bibleplaces.com/2006/10/is-this-noahs-ark-new-critique-by.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-116064326079618054' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/20570989/posts/default/116064326079618054' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>