tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post8260781960971348963..comments2009-06-12T11:25:39.237-05:00Todd Bolenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06156730661243501832tbolen91@bibleplaces.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-40935893401041582402009-06-12T11:25:39.237-05:002009-06-12T11:25:39.237-05:00Joe - thanks for the clarification, and thanks too for all that you do in helping us to stay informed of the latest news.Todd Bolenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06156730661243501832noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-38527956759790215852009-06-12T11:19:54.801-05:002009-06-12T11:19:54.801-05:00While in a sense The Jerusalem Post/The Media Line article (written by Matthew Kalman) is a Golan response, it appears (at least to me) to be to the IAA's accusations and to Kalman's video interview questions and not to the video itself, as the article's quote from Golan (with slight variants) is in Kalman's video. Kalman may simply have used the most provocative and least surprising aspect of the video to file his article. The video may also be seen at Kalman's "Jesus Ossuary Trial Jerusalem" website http://jamesossuarytrial.blogspot.com/ .Joe Lauernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20570989.post-55279389630883117352009-06-12T09:43:44.699-05:002009-06-12T09:43:44.699-05:00you are apparently unaware that joe zias appeared on video yesterday and that the post story today is golan's response to that video.Jimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16698562143972216357noreply@blogger.com